This week I’ve been thinking about how there’s so much more space for middle ground than we sometimes acknowledge. I don’t mean to say that being in the center or remaining neutral on important issues is superior, but I think even while different communities hold opposing views strongly, there’s still a lot of room to express our values in overlapping ways that are mutually beneficial.
Today, in honour of IDAHOBIT Day, I’d like to share some ideas of ways that someone with conservative Christian views could show their support for LGBTQIA+ image-bearers. I see no reason why these gestures would be incompatible with any Christian beliefs; in fact, I think a Christian worldview should actively compel us to this sort of action.
Imagine a world where conservative Christians and queer activists [and those who are both!] could unite on compassionate acts like this without seeing it as letting the other side ‘win.’ Not every issue has to be a battleground.
- Consider sponsoring the therapy costs for a queer person. One of my gay friends received generous support from an anonymous sponsor through his Presbyterian church, and this made counselling affordable to him. (If you want ideas of how to do this practically, send me a message and I’d be happy to facilitate getting your support to someone in need.)
- Read books and/or listen to podcasts and educate yourself on the lived experiences of same-sex attracted and queer people. Do some of your own theological thinking so we don’t have to educate you ourselves. A great way to start is by asking your queer friends which books they wish people in their lives would listen to to understand them better, then committing to reading those books. (If you don’t have queer friends yet, send me a message and I can help with recommendations.)
- Support the work of [healthy] Christian LGBTQIA+ organisations that are already working to empower and support queer Christians. You could sponsor someone’s registration costs to attend Revoice conference, support a Posture Shift staffworker, or support the bridge-building ministry of outreach organisations like Kaleidoscope. Sadly we don’t have many Australian equivalents of these ministries yet, but many Aussie queer Christians benefit from their global ministry and could benefit even more so with financial support.
- Financially support a queer person leading ministry within a larger Christian organisation like the AFES, IV, or a mission organisation. Often it’s extremely costly (financially as well as emotionally) to simply exist as a queer person in these organisations, and when your income is fundraised through donors, most queer people have to choose between being visible or being financially stable. In a world where donors threaten to withdraw support from openly queer people, consider becoming the financial stability they need to keep serving in these vital ministries.
- Advocate for unisex bathrooms in your church, school, and workplace. If you don’t believe in gender transitioning, offering a safe alternative bathroom for people who don’t identify with their birth gender is the very least you can do to make your own position livable.
- Advocate for easier name change processes that don’t require a trans person to undergo surgery and/or hormone therapy first. If you believe people should not pursue gender-affirming care like surgery, then you have an obligation to make it easier for people to access the services they need without surgery as the prerequisite. This includes improving accessibility in changing names on official documents (like birth certificates) as well as social spaces (like Facebook name change policies).
- Advocate for easier processes to change gender in official records for the same reasons as above. This includes improving accessibility in areas like school records and organisation databases as well as legal/government documentation.
- Advocate for free counselling services for trans and gender diverse people to close the life expectancy gap.
- Advocate for emergency housing services for trans and gender diverse people to close the homelessness gap, especially for those escaping domestic violence and/or made homeless by their own families. Meeting these basic human needs shouldn’t be a difficult sell to genuine Christians, but again, if your convictions are that a [male-to-female] trans woman shouldn’t be housed in a women’s shelter, then you have an moral obligation to provide safe alternatives.
- Financially support these services.
- Practice using gender neutral and/or gender inclusive language to avoid unnecessarily triggering someone’s gender dysphoria. If your church teaches that someone with gender dysphoria should not transition to the gender they identify with, you have an obligation to make that livable by minimising hazards that trigger or intensify that dysphoria. When you use well-intentioned binary language like “we’re all brothers and sisters in Christ,” knowing that this person has chosen not to transition to male but feels misgendered when described as female, you risk heightening their gender dysphoria every time you say that phrase. A zero-cost alternative that is perfectly compatible with a conservative worldview is either using gender-neutral options (“siblings in Christ”) which are usually more succinct anyway, or using gender-inclusive language (“brothers, sisters, and siblings in Christ.”).
I’m sure there are loads of other ideas we could add to the list – comment your ideas and I’ll update the list over time!
Hi Matthew, This is 100% patronising: “Do some of your own theological thinking so we don’t have to educate you ourselves.” You need treat your reader better if you wish them to take you seriously.
LikeLike
Hi anonymous, I’m sorry for the patronising tone. I confess when I go back and read that line you quoted again, I can see how it would come across with “so we don’t have to educate you ourselves” sounding in a disgruntled tone, even though that wasn’t the tone I had in mind when I wrote it. I’ll admit this wasn’t the best choice of words to communicate what I intended.
The point behind it is a principle I still stand by, though. Is your tension with the point itself or the tone? Or both?
LikeLike
We are done.
LikeLike
I thought your original point was well made and fair
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love you only want support for what you deem the right LGBTQ people. In fact labeling homophobic groups safe groups just shows how internalized your homophobia is.
LikeLike
You don’t want LGBTQ people to be supported. You only want those you deem the “good” LGBTQ people to be supported. Internalized homophobia is quite a drug.
LikeLike
Hey there Manlambda. I’m really sorry that was your takeaway from what I wrote, because it genuinely is my intention to create space for all queer people regardless of religious beliefs, so I’m grieved to hear that my writing in this space has come across as such conditional acceptance only for those I deem worthy. If you notice specific things I say/do on here that are actively harmful to LGBTQIA+ people, I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on those things (though of course you don’t owe me or anyone else free emotional labour).
I’ve been on a journey for several years of navigating how to hold my own beliefs with integrity while actively advocating for the dignity and rights of other queer people regardless of their faith–in fact, the way I’ve aligned myself with the causes of Affirming queer folk has led to being estranged from my family and several faith communities. I wouldn’t have it any other way, and I acknowledge that I still operate from a place of privilege where the fact that opting in to this solidarity and its social ramifications is a choice I get to make (and theoretically opt out of) affords me a level of privilege most queer folk simply never had.
I’m gathering tonight with 20 other queer people of faith to host a Pride-themed Queer Worship Night I’ve initiated, and the majority of people attending these monthly gatherings are Affirming. Many will be there with their same-gender partners and will have valued speaking/leading roles in the community. I’m not saying this to virtue signal or defend myself, but to hopefully paint a more nuanced picture that some of us are seeking to be true to our Side B theology while creating space for others with views we disagree with – and that we can even co-create safe and life-giving communities together that aren’t defined by polarising binaries.
So all of that to say, I very much care about the concerns you raise, and I would value your insights on specific things I’ve said/done that may have caused harm I wasn’t aware of. Because I do want to do this better. Thanks for weighing in.
LikeLike